ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2025
Knowledge and practices of infection prevention and control measures in the obstetrics and gynecology department of a referral hospital in Cameroon.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are a major problem in healthcare facilities. In Cameroon, maternal and neonatal mortality remain a concern. The underlying determinants include shortcomings in the quality of care, inadequate infrastructure and inconsistent application of infection prevention and control (IPC) measures. The objective of this study was to identify risks that increase the likelihood of HAIs in the obstetrics-gynecology unit of a referral hospital of Yaoundé.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the obstetrics-gynecology department of referral hospital of Yaoundé from April to July 2024. Data were collected using a self-administered questionnaire. A World Health Organization (WHO) tool was used to assess knowledge of hand hygiene, and scores were categorized as good (≥ 75%), average (50-74%), and poor (< 50%). An appropriate WHO tool was also used to assess the level of implementation of the IPC framework.
resultsA total of 41 healthcare workers (HCWs) were enrolled in the study. Participants were predominantly female (78%) and aged 20-57 years (median: 30 years). Hand hygiene knowledge was average, with a median score of 60%. More than two-thirds of respondents (n = 30; 73%) reported that they did not systematically practice hand hygiene before and after patient care. The most common reason for not practicing hand washing was the absence of a hand-washing site near their healthcare post (57%). Face shields were the most frequently reported unavailable equipment (81%). Nearly one-third of HCWs (34%, n = 14) reported having received training in IPC measures, with paramedics being the most represented (52%). In contrast, no medical students reported having received this training. Most HCWs reported having received hand hygiene training, with a particularly high proportion among medical students (80%). Most participants (80%) reported having received training two years ago or more. Less than one-third of respondents (24%) reported the availability of posters on equipment sterilization protocols. The overall score (335.6/800) indicated that the obstetrics-gynecology department had a basic level of implementation of IPC interventions.
conclusionsSuboptimal IPC implementation was observed in this obstetrics-gynecology setting. Comprehensive interventions are needed, including strengthened IPC adherence, healthcare worker education, and the establishment of regular IPC framework assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.