ArticleBMC research notes2025
Addressing gaps in pre-diabetes care: health professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and counseling practices.
Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrediabetes is a global concern and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Early detection of prediabetes plays a crucial role since it is a reversible disease. Healthcare providers play a very important role in screening at-risk patients and implementing preventive measures early. This study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude and counseling practices regarding prediabetes which will serve as a tool to create targeted training in the future.
methodWe conducted a cross-sectional study on 312 general practitioners and junior doctors. A structured questionnaire designed after detailed literature search was used to collect data on knowledge (23 questions), attitudes (6 questions) and counseling practices (8 questions) regarding prediabetes. The relationship between a range of factors with knowledge, attitude and counseling practices was studied using univariate and multivariate analyses.
resultsOf total, 71.5% (223) of the study participants were males; the average age was 42.7 ± 15.1 years; Only 13.1% had adequate knowledge, 19.9% showed a positive attitude and 77.6% had good counseling practices for prediabetes and diabetes patients and their families. Compared to those with inadequate knowledge, participants with adequate knowledge had been practicing medicine for less than 10 years. Positive attitude and good counseling were however observed more in those with 20 or more years of clinical experience. Females were less likely to have adequate knowledge when compared to males (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6, p-value = 0.004). A positive attitude toward prediabetes management was significantly higher among participants older than 40 years (OR = 18.6, p-value < 0.001), females (OR = 6.7, p-value < 0.001), and those with over 20 years of clinical experience (OR = 6.3, p-value = 0.014) in managing prediabetes/diabetes patients compared to their counterparts. Additionally, participants with more than 20 years of experience in managing diabetes patients were significantly more likely to exhibit good counseling behavior (OR = 9.1, 95% CI: 1.5-51.7, p = 0.013) compared to those with less than 10 years of experience.
conclusionThis study identified significant gaps of knowledge among general practitioners. While general practitioners demonstrated poor attitudes, they exhibited commendable counseling practices toward patients with prediabetes and their families. The identified gaps and challenges stress the need for tailored educational initiatives and intervention but also targeted efforts to address attitudes alongside enhancing clinical skills. Limitations of the study, including the potential sampling biases and development of a new, non-validated questionnaire, should be considered when interpreting the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.