Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286998›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Addressing gaps in pre-diabetes care: health professionals' knowledge, attitudes, and counseling practices.

Kashif Shafique, Nadia Shah, Saba Mughal, Iqra Ansari, Rija Siddiqui, Muhammad Fareed Uddin, Riasat Ali Khan, Asima Khan Niazi, Shabeen Naz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kashif ShafiqueSchool of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Nadia ShahSchool of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan. Nadia.shah@duhs.edu.pk.
Saba MughalSchool of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Iqra AnsariOffice of Research, Innovation & Commercialization, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rija SiddiquiSchool of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Muhammad Fareed UddinNational Institute of Diabetes & Endocrinology, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Riasat Ali KhanBaqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Karachi, Pakistan.
Asima Khan NiaziPublic Health Department, Baqai Institute of Diabetology and Endocrinology, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shabeen NazHead Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isra University Karachi- Campus, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrediabetes is a global concern and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Early detection of prediabetes plays a crucial role since it is a reversible disease. Healthcare providers play a very important role in screening at-risk patients and implementing preventive measures early. This study aimed to assess healthcare professionals' knowledge, attitude and counseling practices regarding prediabetes which will serve as a tool to create targeted training in the future.

methodWe conducted a cross-sectional study on 312 general practitioners and junior doctors. A structured questionnaire designed after detailed literature search was used to collect data on knowledge (23 questions), attitudes (6 questions) and counseling practices (8 questions) regarding prediabetes. The relationship between a range of factors with knowledge, attitude and counseling practices was studied using univariate and multivariate analyses.

resultsOf total, 71.5% (223) of the study participants were males; the average age was 42.7 ± 15.1 years; Only 13.1% had adequate knowledge, 19.9% showed a positive attitude and 77.6% had good counseling practices for prediabetes and diabetes patients and their families. Compared to those with inadequate knowledge, participants with adequate knowledge had been practicing medicine for less than 10 years. Positive attitude and good counseling were however observed more in those with 20 or more years of clinical experience. Females were less likely to have adequate knowledge when compared to males (OR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.6, p-value = 0.004). A positive attitude toward prediabetes management was significantly higher among participants older than 40 years (OR = 18.6, p-value < 0.001), females (OR = 6.7, p-value < 0.001), and those with over 20 years of clinical experience (OR = 6.3, p-value = 0.014) in managing prediabetes/diabetes patients compared to their counterparts. Additionally, participants with more than 20 years of experience in managing diabetes patients were significantly more likely to exhibit good counseling behavior (OR = 9.1, 95% CI: 1.5-51.7, p = 0.013) compared to those with less than 10 years of experience.

conclusionThis study identified significant gaps of knowledge among general practitioners. While general practitioners demonstrated poor attitudes, they exhibited commendable counseling practices toward patients with prediabetes and their families. The identified gaps and challenges stress the need for tailored educational initiatives and intervention but also targeted efforts to address attitudes alongside enhancing clinical skills. Limitations of the study, including the potential sampling biases and development of a new, non-validated questionnaire, should be considered when interpreting the results.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCounselingGeneral PractitionersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelPrediabetic StateAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudes3Counseling4General practitionersKnowledge2Prediabetes1

Identifiers

PMID41286998
PMCPMC12642367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.