ArticleBioData mining2025
Deep vision in agriculture: assessing the function of YOLO in the classification of plant leaf diseases (PLDs).
Article in BioData mining, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Dual Branch Fusion Network for Simultaneous Tea Leaf Disease Diagnosis and Age-Based Quality Grade Evaluation.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant leaf diseases (PLDs) can continue to be a significant problem in the agricultural sector, leading to significant losses in production and jeopardizing food security. Early detection is essential, and recent achievements in the domain of deep learning (DL) have made automated high-accuracy solutions possible. The most popular and commonly used of these is the You Only Look Once (YOLO) family of object detection models, which have been proposed to detect plant diseases in real time. This review presents a new and in-depth synthesis of YOLO-based methods, including YOLOv1 to YOLOv10 and the domain-specific variants, including CTB-YOLO (coriander), BED-YOLO (YOLOv10n), and RAG-augmented YOLOv8 (coffee). This work compares to previous surveys in that (i) it presents a structured dataset catalog containing information on size, resolution, disease classes, and limitations (such as imbalance and annotation problems); (ii) it provides comparative benchmarking analysis of performance measures (accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, mean Average Precision, and frames per second) across versions of YOLO to illustrate trade-offs between speed and accuracy; and (iii) it gives forward-looking discussion on how (ii) open challenges and (iii) future research directions, including lightweight YOLO models to run on mobile. This review presents a summative reference and a new contribution to the progress of the YOLO-based PLD detection approach to sustainable agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.