Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286897›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Estimating quantile treatment effect on the original scale of the outcome variable: a case study of common cold treatments.

Harri Hemilä, Matti Pirinen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Harri HemiläDepartment of Public Health, University of Helsinki, POB 20, Helsinki, FI-00014, Finland. harri.hemila@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4710-307X
Matti PirinenDepartment of Public Health, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, and Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1664-1350

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffects of treatments on continuous outcomes are commonly estimated using the mean difference (in units of measurement) or the ratio of means (percentages), each providing a single average effect across the study population. Quantile treatment effect (QTE) analysis is more informative as it estimates the effect of treatment across the whole population. A limitation of the standard QTE is its presentation over control group quantiles, which can hinder interpretability. Presentation of the effect over the measurement units would often be more informative.

methodsWe introduce a method to estimate back-transformed QTE (BQTE), which presents QTEs as a function of the original outcome values in the control group. This approach uses a bootstrap algorithm to estimate both the BQTE curve and its uncertainty. We further derive informative bounds for the average treatment effect at the upper and lower tails of the distribution. The method was applied to 3 datasets on the treatment of the common cold: zinc gluconate lozenges, zinc acetate lozenges, and nasal carrageenan.

resultsAcross all 3 datasets, BQTE revealed substantial heterogeneity in treatment effects on the units of measurement scale (days). Specifically, shorter colds showed smaller average effects than longer colds, indicating that the assumption of a constant mean difference across the distribution may be inappropriate. In all cases, the relative scale provided a better summary of the BQTE distribution than the mean difference.

conclusionsThe BQTE method enhances the interpretability of QTEs by presenting results on the outcome's original scale. It provides a nuanced understanding of how the average treatment effect varies across the distribution. BQTE is particularly suited for analyzing continuous clinical outcomes such as illness duration or hospital stay and offers a valuable complement to the standard effect size measures in individual-patient data meta-analysis and clinical trial reporting.

Indexed as

Common ColdModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCarrageenanCommon coldControlled clinical trialsData interpretationHealth careOutcome assessmentQuantile regressionQuantile treatment effectRandomized controlled trialTreatment outcomeZinc lozenges

Identifiers

PMID41286897
PMCPMC12645726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.