Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286888›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2025

Effect of positive end-expiratory pressure on risk of microaspiration and ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanically ventilated ICU patients: a prospective study.

Ji Chen, Min Zhang, Yan Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ji ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Room 201, 267, Glanyuntian II, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China. chenji634814921@sina.com.
Min ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Room 201, 267, Glanyuntian II, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.
Yan MaDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ningbo University, Room 201, 267, Glanyuntian II, Yinzhou District, Ningbo, 315000, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

Zhejiang Province medicine and health program project 2022KY1097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Microaspiration of subglottic secretions has a pivotal role in VAP pathogenesis, yet the optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) for preventing microaspiration has not been extablished.

methodsThis prospective, single-center study determined the impact of different PEEP levels on microaspiration in 90 mechanically ventilated patients. Participants were stratified into three groups based on PEEP levels (0-3 cmH₂O, 4-6 cmH₂O, and 7-10 cmH₂O). Primary outcomes included biomarkers, such as pepsin concentration in airway secretions, and the incidence of microaspiration. Secondary outcomes assessed subglottic secretion volume, mechanical ventilation duration, and ICU length of stay.

resultsHigher PEEP levels (4-6 cmH₂O and 7-10 cmH₂O) were associated with significantly lower microaspiration rates and pepsin concentrations in airway secretions compared to the lowest PEEP group (0-3 cmH₂O; P < 0.05). Patients in the higher PEEP groups exhibited reduced total subglottic secretion volumes over 7 d and a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation. Group C (7-10 cmH₂O) demonstrated the most pronounced benefits with respect to microaspiration. No significant differences were observed in the duration of ICU stay among the groups.

conclusionElevated PEEP levels, especially within the 7-10 cmH₂O range, effectively reduce microaspiration, minimize subglottic secretion leakage, and shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation. These findings highlight the clinical importance of higher PEEP settings in reducing VAP risk and improving patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Intensive Care UnitsPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesMechanical ventilationMicroaspirationPositive-end expiratory pressureVentilator-associated pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID41286888
PMCPMC12645777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.