ArticleBMC health services research2025
Safe technology use in the operating room and related factors.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe rapid advancement of medical technologies has transformed operating rooms into complex, high-tech environments. Ensuring the safe use of these technologies is vital for both patient and staff safety.
objectivesThis study aimed to assess the level of safe technology use among healthcare professionals in operating rooms and to identify factors influencing these practices.
methodsThis descriptive and correlational study was conducted between December 2024 and April 2025 in three hospitals in eastern Turkey. A total of 271 healthcare professionals, including surgeons, anesthesiologists, anesthesia technicians, and nurses, participated. Data were collected using a Healthcare professional identification form and the Safe Use of Technology in the Operating Room Scale[SUTORS]. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman correlation tests.
resultsParticipants reported high scores across all SUTORS sections: General Practices[M = 4.28 ± 0.76], Surgical Team[M = 4.29 ± 0.70], and Anesthesia Team[M = 4.49 ± 0.51]. Statistically significant differences were observed by profession, education level, and prior training[p < 0.05]. Nurses and anesthesia technicians general practices scored higher than surgeons and anesthesiologists. Also as General Practices increased, the anesthesia team’s safe technology usage scores increased too [r = 0.686, p < 0.01].
conclusionOperating room staff generally exhibit positive attitudes and behaviors toward the safe use of technology. Higher education and prior training are associated with improved safety practices. Institutions should implement regular in-service training to support safe and effective technology integration in surgical environments. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.