ArticleBMC medical education2025
Assessing moral competence in medical and psychology students: effects on anxiety and test duration in online versus paper-based testing.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMoral competence and anxiety are essential factors in medical and psychology education, but evidence on how these variables interact across different testing conditions is limited. The present study examined whether moral competence differs between medical and psychology students, how it relates to anxiety levels, and whether test format and duration influence outcomes.
methodsA total of 717 students (620 medical, 97 psychology) completed the Moral Competence Test (MCT) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Participants were systematically (quasi-randomly) assigned to an online or paper-based version of the tests. Test duration was recorded in both formats. Group differences were analyzed using generalized linear models, with additional attention to the relationship between completion time and moral competence.
resultsPsychology students scored higher in moral competence than medical students, while anxiety remained elevated among medical students. Female students reported significantly higher trait anxiety than male students. No significant differences were found between online and paper-based formats in moral competence or anxiety outcomes. Longer test duration was associated with higher moral competence among medical students, although this relationship was correlational and should be interpreted cautiously.
conclusionsFindings confirm that moral competence declines during medical education while anxiety persists at a higher level, particularly among female students. In contrast, psychology students demonstrated stable or higher moral competence. The absence of differences between online and paper-based formats suggests that both are suitable for assessing moral competence and anxiety in academic settings. The observed association between test duration and moral competence highlights a potential area for further research but should not be interpreted causally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.