ArticleRespiratory research2025
PD-L1
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for the occurrence and mortality of sepsis-associated lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Neutrophil Heterogeneity: Molecules to Cellular Behavior.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Correction: PD-L1Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Mitochondrial dysfunction in sepsis-induced immunoparalysis: from immune-cell metabolic reprogramming to clinical biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSepsis-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by microvascular dysfunction, uncontrolled inflammation, and pulmonary edema, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Despite their clinical importance, targeted therapies are lacking. Neutrophils play a critical role in sepsis-induced lung injury, but the specific contributions of PD-L1+ neutrophils remain poorly understood. The aim of this study was to elucidate the role of PD-L1+ neutrophils in endothelial injury and the underlying mechanisms during sepsis.
methodsWe employed single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to analyze neutrophil heterogeneity in septic lungs and identified a distinct PD-L1 + neutrophil subpopulation. Using a murine model of sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture (CLP), we isolated PD-L1+ neutrophils and assessed their effects on pulmonary vascular endothelial cells (ECs) through coculture experiments. In vivo, PD-L1 was systemically neutralized using a neutralizing antibody to assess the impact of PD-L1 on lung injury and inflammatory responses.
resultsscRNA-seq revealed a unique PD-L1+ neutrophil subpopulation that infiltrated the lungs during sepsis. These neutrophils exacerbated endothelial pyroptosis, leading to vascular barrier dysfunction and increased inflammatory cytokine release. Mechanistically, PD-L1+ neutrophils exhibited a metabolic shift from oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) to glycolysis, which amplified their proinflammatory effects. The systemic neutralization of PD-L1 significantly reduced pulmonary endothelial dysfunction, inflammatory responses, and lung injury in septic mice, as evidenced by decreased vascular permeability, reduced inflammatory cytokine levels, and improved histopathological injury.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that PD-L1+ neutrophils play pivotal roles in driving endothelial pyroptosis and vascular injury during sepsis. The metabolic reprogramming of these neutrophils, characterized by a shift from OXPHOS to glycolysis, underlies their proinflammatory effects. Targeting PD-L1 or modulating metabolic pathways may offer novel therapeutic strategies to improve the clinical prognosis of sepsis-induced ARDS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.