ArticleBMC medical education2025
Revolutionizing patient care: assessing ai-created discharge education for total hip replacement patients.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious research has shown that artificial intelligence (AI) technology is effective in a wide range of applications. Although studies exist in other specialties evaluating AI-generated educational materials, no study was found focusing on Turkish-language discharge education materials specifically for total hip replacement patients. This study was conducted using the ChatGPT 4.0 program for patients who underwent total hip replacement to develop an artificial intelligence-supported discharge education material that patients who will be discharged after surgery can read and understand.
methodsIn this methodological study, expert opinions were obtained while preparing the artificial intelligence-assisted discharge education material for patients who underwent AI-assisted discharge education, and the educational needs of the patients were determined by reviewing the literature. Then, 6 commands were given in the ChatGPT-4 program to create the educational content. The Turkish readability of the created educational content and the readability of the health literature were evaluated using formulas. The validity of the total hip replacement discharge material was presented to 10 experts. Experts assessed the comprehensibility and applicability of the educational material using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool and the Global Quality Scale, which assesses the quality of educational materials.
resultsIt was concluded that the readability index of the total hip replacement discharge education material for Turkish was 69.5, and the Turkish readability level was "easily understandable". The readability index of health literature was 9.30, 7.90, 8.09, 60.0, and 10.00, respectively. When the internal consistency coefficient between the experts was examined, it was 0.84. It was determined that the Patient Education Materials Evaluation Tool understandability score average was 80.60 ± 9.74, and the actionability score average was 77.4 ± 19.10. The Global Quality Scale (GQS) score average was found to be 4.20 ± 0.79 (range: 3-5).
conclusionAt the end of the study, it was determined that the educational material was adequate in terms of understandability and actionability. The Turkish readability level was also reasonable and easily understandable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.