ArticleBMC public health2025
Attitudes toward cancer screening and its' associated factors: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCancer is one of the leading public health challenges globally. Despite the availability of effective screening methods and treatments, participation in cancer screening programs remains low in many regions. Evidence suggests that individuals' attitudes toward screening significantly influence their participation. This study aimed to investigate attitudes toward cancer screening and its associated factors.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 450 individuals aged 30 to 70 years who visited comprehensive health centers in southern Tehran from September to December 2024. A multistage sampling method was used: one health center was randomly selected from each of the five districts, and eligible participants were consecutively recruited. Data were collected using a demographic questionnaire and the Persian version of the Attitude Scale for Cancer Screening (ASCS-P15). Statistical analysis was done using the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman correlation. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered.
resultsThe median (interquartile range) of attitudes toward cancer screening was 63 (19.25), with a range of scores achieved from 16 to 75. Significant associations were found between attitude scores and gender, education level, monthly income, and family cancer history (P < 0.05). Men reported more positive attitudes compared with women. Participants with a family history of cancer also demonstrated significantly higher overall attitude scores than those without such a history. The "Willing Attitude" subscale was significantly associated with family cancer history, income, education, employment status, and age. The "Unwilling Attitude" subscale was linked to family cancer history, income, and using fast food (P < 0.05).
conclusionAlthough the overall attitude toward cancer screening was positive among the study population, low participation rates suggest that other barriers may exist. Future research should focus on identifying these barriers to improve the effectiveness and reach of screening programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.