ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2025
Comparison of clinical practices during the transitional and young adult phases between patients with oligoarticular/polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis and those with rheumatoid arthritis in Japan.
Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundJuvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is a chronic inflammatory condition that frequently persists into adulthood, posing long-term challenges in disease control and quality of life. However, clinical management during the transitional and young adult phases remains insufficiently characterized, especially in comparison with adult-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This study aimed to compare disease activity, medication use, and treatment practices between patients with oligoarticular/polyarticular JIA and those with RA, focusing on individuals aged 16-30 years.
methodsData were derived from two nationwide multicenter databases in Japan-NinJa (National Database of Rheumatic Diseases in Japan) for RA and CoNinJa (a pediatric counterpart of NinJa) for JIA. A total of 176 JIA and 152 RA patients, all aged 16-30 years, were analyzed. Clinical parameters, disease activity indices, and medication profiles were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test.
resultsCompared to RA patients, JIA patients demonstrated significantly lower disease activity (median SDAI 0.6 vs. 2.4) and higher remission rates, particularly Boolean remission (70% vs. 44%) (p < 0.001). MTX usage was less frequent in JIA (49% vs. 68%, p < 0.001), whereas biologic use was notably more common (69% vs. 38%, p < 0.001), with 31% involving off-label prescriptions. Among patients in CDAI remission, biologic monotherapy was observed more frequently in JIA (29% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). Discontinuation of MTX was most commonly attributed to disease improvement (58%) or gastrointestinal intolerance (nausea, 29%). Subcutaneous tocilizumab, though unapproved for JIA in Japan, had the lowest discontinuation rate (4%), suggesting favorable tolerability.
conclusionsDespite an overlap in age, patients with JIA and RA exhibit distinct disease characteristics and therapeutic patterns. These differences underscore the need to expand approved treatment options for JIA, promote equitable access to biologics, and strengthen transitional care frameworks. Further research is warranted to explore long-term outcomes, reproductive health considerations, and socioeconomic barriers that influence treatment continuity in young adults with childhood-onset arthritis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.