ArticleBMC public health2025
Barriers to accessibility and availability of safe abortion services among young women in Nepal: a mixed-methods study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite Nepal's progressive legal framework permitting abortion, young women continue to face barriers in accessing safe abortion services (SAS), leading to preventable maternal mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to identify the key obstacles to SAS access among young women in the Makwanpur district of Nepal.
methodsA convergent mixed-methods study was conducted in 2018. The quantitative component involved a cross-sectional survey of 447 female students aged 18-34, using a structured questionnaire to assess knowledge, stigma (via the Stigmatizing Attitudes, Beliefs, and Actions Scale - SABAS), and access to SAS. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors associated with low access. The qualitative component included six in-depth interviews with post-abortive women (PAWs), four with abortion service providers (ASPs), and three focus group discussions (FGDs) with 26 young community women. Data were analyzed thematically and integrated to provide a comprehensive understanding.
resultsQuantitatively, only 54.14% of respondents had high access to SAS. Key factors associated with low access included high abortion stigma (AOR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.06-8.35), no internet use (AOR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.02-3.86), and no contact with Female Community Health Volunteers (FCHVs) (AOR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.21-4.31). While 70.69% knew abortion was legal, knowledge of specific legal conditions and free services was limited (47%). Qualitatively, seven key barriers emerged: [1] critical knowledge gaps about legality and service availability; [2] financial constraints, particularly for transportation; [3] pervasive abortion stigma and discrimination, especially against unmarried women; [4] geographical inaccessibility in rural areas; [5] marital status discrimination; [6] concerns about service quality and confidentiality; and [7] a lack of trained providers and resources, particularly for manual vacuum aspiration (MVA).
conclusionA complex interplay of informational, social, financial, and structural barriers impedes young women's access to safe abortion in Nepal. Interventions must be multi-faceted, including targeted awareness campaigns (leveraging media and FCHVs), stigma reduction programs, expansion of services in rural areas, and strengthening of healthcare provider training and resources to ensure equitable access to safe abortion for all young women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.