ArticleBMC surgery2025
Is drain placement necessary in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach?
Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTransoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy via Vestibular Approach (TOETVA) offers a scar-free alternative for thyroid surgery. Traditionally, drains are used to prevent hematoma, seroma, and infection, yet the need for routine drain placement in TOETVA remains uncertain.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of TOETVA patients from August 2021 to September 2024 at a single tertiary center. Patients were divided into drain and non-drain groups. All patients underwent unilateral TOETVA, with or without central lymph node dissection. Key outcomes included operative time, postoperative pain, hospital stay, and complications. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to minimize selection bias. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
resultsA total of 408 TOETVA patients were included, with 214 in the drain group and 194 in the non-drain group. After PSM, 174 matched pairs were analyzed. Operative time, pain scores, hematoma, seroma, and infection rates were comparable between groups. However, the non-drain group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (3.38 ± 0.94 vs. 4.37 ± 1.02 days, p < 0.001). No significant differences in hospitalization costs were observed.
conclusionRoutine drain placement may not be necessary in TOETVA patients, as omission of drains did not increase complication rates and was associated with shorter hospitalization in our cohort. Prospective multicenter studies are required to validate the optimal criteria for selective drain use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.