Observational studyBMC pulmonary medicine2025
Shorten swallowing time and its implication in patients with chronic cough: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPatients with chronic cough (CC) frequently exhibit swallowing dysfunction related to laryngeal hypersensitivity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of swallowing time (ST) measurement in the etiological assessment and management of CC.
methodsThe ST was measured in 176 patients with CC and 82 healthy controls. Follow-up assessments were conducted among 49 patients with gastroesophageal reflux-associated cough (GERC) and 86 with other causes of CC (non-GERC). Associations between ST and clinical features were analyzed, and the predictive performance of ST for guiding treatment intensification was evaluated in GERC patients and compared with the Hull Airway Reflux Questionnaire (HARQ) and Reflux Symptom Index (RSI).
resultsThe ST was significantly shorter in CC than in healthy controls (1.167 ± 0.446 s vs. 1.798 ± 0.721 s, p < 0.001), and varied significantly among etiological subtypes (p = 0.019). ST was notably reduced in GERC compared to non-GERC patients, showing a specificity of 85.7% but sensitivity of 46.5%. In GERC patients, ST correlated negatively with RSI and HARQ scores, and positively with capsaicin cough threshold (C5). Shorter ST (< 1.015 s) was associated with proximal reflux events and greater need for intensified anti-reflux therapy (χ2 = 17.686, p < 0.001). ST also exhibited superior predictive accuracy over HARQ and RSI scores.
conclusionSwallowing reflex hypersensitivity is prevalent in CC, especially in GERC. ST assessment provides valuable information for etiological differentiation and helps guide optimal treatment intensification in GERC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.