Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286773›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2025

Empathy training in healthcare: an umbrella review.

Aniela Edwards, Krista-Gaie Grant, Nicole C Hammer, Miad Alfaqih, Kyi Phyu Nyein, Alice Abia-Okon, Rachel Grossman, Megan E Gregory

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aniela Edwards *College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Krista-Gaie Grant *College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nicole C HammerDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Miad AlfaqihDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Kyi Phyu NyeinDepartment of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Alice Abia-OkonDepartment of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Rachel GrossmanDepartment of Psychology, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Megan E GregoryDepartment of Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. megan.gregory@ufl.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmpathy among healthcare professionals is declining due to burnout and demands of clinical practice. By honing empathetic skills, clinicians can improve patient-centered care, communication, trust, and healthcare outcomes. While prior reviews on empathy training in healthcare exist, many focus on narrow inclusion criteria, resulting in a lack of a comprehensive understanding of empathy training across the broad spectrum of healthcare. We conducted an umbrella review of these reviews to assess the impacts of various training, educational, or experiential learning methods on empathy among healthcare providers, staff, and students.

methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using terms such as “empathy,” “compassion,” and “training,” to identify systematic, scoping, and narrative reviews on empathy training for healthcare workers and students. Two coders screened and coded the reviews, including their inclusion and exclusion criteria (e.g., sample, training methods), number of studies included, and results of each review. Study quality for each review was assessed using AMSTAR.

resultsAcross 42 reviews, 71% conclude that empathy training is associated with positive outcomes for students, staff, providers, or patients. Empathy training appears to be effective for all health-related professions, including both students and practicing healthcare workers. Training that encourages active participation (e.g., experiential learning, reflective exercises) is generally associated with better outcomes compared to more passive methods. Training that integrates self-reflection and incorporates patients into the training also appears more impactful.

conclusionsLearner engagement and training methods significantly influence empathy training outcomes. There is a need to standardize empathy assessment tools and increase long-term follow-up to assess sustainability of outcomes.

Indexed as

EmpathyHealth PersonnelHumansPatient-Centered CareCommunicationEducationEmpathyHealth personnelMedicalTraining

Identifiers

PMID41286773
PMCPMC12751220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.