Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286738›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Building readiness in community-based organisations to enable the implementation of public health interventions for adults and older adults: a scoping review.

Leanne Hassett, Anne M Moseley, Lindsay Nettlefold, Louise M N Pearce, Thea Franke, Heather M Macdonald, Anne Tiedemann, Heather A McKay

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leanne HassettFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. leanne.hassett@sydney.edu.au.
Anne M MoseleyFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Lindsay NettlefoldFaculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Louise M N PearceFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Thea FrankeFaculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Heather M MacdonaldFaculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Anne TiedemannFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Heather A McKayFaculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Funding

CIHR HG2-185013National Health and Medical Research Council 2018862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA key challenge to implementing and scaling up evidence-based interventions (EBIs) into practice is organisational readiness; described as an organisation's motivation, general capacities, and capabilities specific to the EBI. Building organisational readiness has been investigated in some health disciplines (e.g., mental health). However, the importance of building organisational readiness to effectively implement public health EBIs for adults and older adults in the community setting remains largely unexplored. Our aim was to examine how readiness was defined and measured, what strategies were used to build readiness, and the relationship between readiness-building strategies and implementation, service-level, and person-level outcomes.

methodsIn this scoping review, we searched seven databases and conducted forward and backward citation tracking. From a pool of eight reviewers, combinations of two reviewers independently screened references for eligibility. A single reviewer extracted data, and a second reviewer checked data. Results for each implementation, service-level and person-level outcome in each study were extracted and categorised as favourable, nonsignificant, or unfavourable.

resultsTwelve studies were included, which implemented a mix of different public health EBIs to almost 40,000 participants (n = 37,883; 54% women) across varied community settings. Only four studies defined readiness; all used different definitions. Five studies used five different instruments to assess readiness, all with poor psychometric properties. All studies used multiple strategies to build readiness (range 4-20 strategies per study), with all using strategies to assess, plan and monitor implementation of the EBI (i.e., 'evaluative and iterative strategies') and strategies to support collaboration between organisations delivering the EBI (i.e., 'develop interest-holder interrelationships'). Three-quarters of the strategies focused on building the organisation's capability to deliver the specific EBI (e.g., assessing readiness, conducting educational meetings) and were delivered by external support teams. Exploring the relationship between readiness-building strategies and study outcomes indicated more favourable than unfavourable outcomes, particularly for implementation and service-level outcomes (38/48; 79% favourable).

conclusionsWithin this limited sample, the use of readiness-building strategies improved the implementation of public health EBIs in community organisations. However, consistency of definitions and terminology and more sophisticated testing of readiness-building strategies will help confirm how best to do this.

trial registrationOpen Science Framework, May 5, 2024.

Indexed as

Capacity BuildingCommunity Health ServicesEvidence-Based PracticePublic HealthAdultAgedHumansCommunityImplementation strategiesMeasurementOrganisational readinessPublic health

Identifiers

PMID41286738
PMCPMC12763873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.