Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286711›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Tracking public health, utilization and outcomes during a pandemic using monitoring surveys.

John Boyle, Thomas Brassell, Ronaldo Iachan, Rachel Kinder, Randy ZuWallack, James Dayton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John BoyleICF International, 1902 Reston Metro Plaza, Reston, VA, 20190, USA.
Thomas BrassellICF International, 1902 Reston Metro Plaza, Reston, VA, 20190, USA.
Ronaldo IachanICF International, 1902 Reston Metro Plaza, Reston, VA, 20190, USA.
Rachel KinderICF International, 1902 Reston Metro Plaza, Reston, VA, 20190, USA. Rachel.Kinder@icf.com.
Randy ZuWallackICF International, 1902 Reston Metro Plaza, Reston, VA, 20190, USA.
James DaytonICF International, 1902 Reston Metro Plaza, Reston, VA, 20190, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surveys can be a critical tool in monitoring public health during emergencies. Existing surveillance systems may provide timely reporting of cases and deaths associated with diseases. However, during COVID-19 they did not provide accurate information on the number of cases with virus-related symptoms, testing and treatment seeking. In fact, the surge of potentially infected individuals seeking diagnosis, testing and treatment represented a serious but largely unmeasured dimension of the crisis. This study aimed to evaluate the potential value of monitoring health, attitudinal, and behavioral dimensions that are not included in current U.S. disease surveillance systems during population health emergencies. Additionally, it seeks to demonstrate the feasibility of designing and implementing a low-cost, rapid-turnaround health and behavioral monitoring system when comparable data from existing surveillance systems are unavailable. From March through November 2020, we conducted national surveys with approximately 1,000 interviews each month with Census-balanced samples from a large national commercial panel. These surveys employed replicate national samples drawn from all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. A total of 9,200 interviews, averaging about 20 min in length, were completed over the course of the nine months of fielding. Nearly a quarter of respondents (22%) reported they had been sick for three days or longer since January with what might be COVID. Respondents were questioned about their symptoms, whether they had seen a doctor, had a confirmatory test for the COVID virus, and test results. Approximately one in ten respondents were currently experiencing COVID-like symptoms each month (95% CI: 10.7-12.0%). These numbers dwarf the 0.3% in April and 3.6% in November who had ever had a COVID positive test result. Moreover, 42% of these symptomatic adults sought medical care or testing, increasing strains on the health care system,. Although surveys may not be needed to estimate diagnosed cases, hospitalizations, or deaths, they can provide the missing data on symptomatic cases in the population, the proportion seeking medical care, ability to obtain a confirmatory test, and reasons for not seeking care or testing. This study demonstrates the ability of surveys to provide such information in a timely fashion, which could be replicated in other countries.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePublic HealthPublic Health SurveillanceAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultAttitudes and beliefsCOVID-19Health trackingNonprobability samplingSymptomsTesting

Identifiers

PMID41286711
PMCPMC12642068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.