SynthesisBMC cancer2025
PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy, long-term survival and safety of different PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Therapeutic Innovations in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Current Strategies and Emerging Perspectives.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundsThe treatment of locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(LA-NPC) is challenged by recurrence and metastasis(R/M), and even though concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CRT) is the standard regimen, new strategies are urgently needed to improve patient prognosis. In recent years, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, as an important representative of immunotherapy, have shown potential in several studies. However, systematic evidence on the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in LA-NPC is insufficient. Therefore, this study aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in LA-NPC treatment by systematic review and meta-analysis methods.
methodsWe systematically searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (as of March 2025) using subject terms combined with free words to include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors for LA-NPC. The primary outcome metrics were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), event-free survival (EFS), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that met the inclusion criteria.
resultsA total of 2 studies involving 575 participants were included. This meta-analysis showed that patients who received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy combined with CRT had improved PFS (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18–0.89) and EFS (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.38–0.92). For distant metastasis rate and locoregional recurrence rate, PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy combined with CRT was more effective, reaching (OR: 0.50,95% CI: 0.30–0.85 I²=0%, P = 0.8) and (OR: 0.43,95% CI: 0.22–0.81 I²=39%, P = 0.2), respectively, which were significantly lower than patients who received only CRT. However, there was no significant difference in OS (HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.48–1.43,I²=0%, P = 0.34). Safety analysis showed that PD-1 inhibitor treatment was accompanied by a significantly increased risk of immune-related adverse events(IRAEs)(Peto OR: 11.14, 95% CI: 7.79–15.93 I²=93%, P < 0.0001) and incidence of > = grade 3 AEs (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.04–2.17 I²=0%, P = 0.7).
resultsThe meta-analysis showed that PD-1 inhibitors combined with CRT in LA-NPC improved their disease control (in terms of PFS and EFS) and reduced disease recurrence and metastasis, but the effect on OS is unknown and increases the risk of IRAEs. The current evidence is based on limited study data, and its exact efficacy and safety need to be confirmed with more high-quality data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.