ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Perceptions Towards Climate Change and Environmental Resilience Among Adults Living With Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceptions Towards Climate Change and Environmental Resilience Among Adults Living With Mental Illness: A Qualitative Study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the perceptions of climate change and environmental resilience among adults living with mental illness. A qualitative descriptive design was used for this study. To explore themes, 20 participants, from a community organisation that supports adults living with mental illness, were recruited to engage in focus groups. A semi-structured interview guide was used to facilitate the focus group discussion. Data analysis utilised the rigorous and accelerated data reduction (RADaR) technique. Guided by the Health Belief Model's core concepts, we learned that this population's perspectives on climate change varied based on their experiences, their vulnerabilities due to mental illness and socioeconomic conditions, and what they have seen and heard from external sources, including a related scientific seminar. Among the explored concepts, "Barriers to making positive changes to address climate change" was the most robust. Furthermore, although participants perceived multiple barriers to mitigate climate change, they identified diverse ways to take action and reduce its harmful impact. To better serve this vulnerable group, both individual-level interventions and policy and organisational changes are required to combat climate change and lessen its impacts among adults living with mental illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.