Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286531›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Attentional processing in a modified multiple object-tracking paradigm.

Mengzhu Fu, Emmanuella Asabere, Michael D Dodd

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mengzhu FuDepartment of Psychology, Shippensburg University of Pennsylvania, Shippensburg, PA, USA. mfu@ship.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-9869-990X
Emmanuella AsabereDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln and the Center for Brain, Biology, and Behavior, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Michael D DoddDepartment of Psychology, University of Nebraska - Lincoln and the Center for Brain, Biology, and Behavior, Lincoln, NE, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research examining dynamic visual search showed that pop-out effects can be observed for color targets, though it is unclear whether these effects are attributable to the same pre-attentive mechanisms driving pop-out in static displays (Fu et al., Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 3329-3339, 2020). Other research examining multiple-object tracking (MOT) demonstrated that people can track three to five objects simultaneously, with some uncertainty about the flexibility of attentional allocation during tracking (Meyerhoff et al., Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1255-1274, 2017). In three experiments, the present study combined a dynamic pop-out display with the MOT task. Participants saw moving objects with colors changing continuously and responded when a uniquely shaded target popped out among identical items. Experiment 1 examined the mechanisms driving dynamic visual search efficiency and dual task interference on both tracking and searching performance. Experiment 2 explored the effect of processing orientations (i.e., global/local). Experiment 3 incorporated an abrupt color change to examine performance. Results showed that search for a unique target in dynamic contexts required attention, with an interference effect observed for both searching and tracking in the dual task. Making the color change more abrupt improved performance but remained less efficient than static pop-out. Moreover, there is some evidence suggesting that adopting a global processing orientation may be more advantageous for task performance than a local processing orientation. Taken together, the current findings suggest that search for a unique target in dynamic contexts requires focal attention and that tracking and searching appear to involve similar processing mechanism that likely compete to draw from a shared pool of resources.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionMotion PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualPsychomotor PerformanceAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAttentionMotion*OtherVisual search

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.