ArticleScientific reports2025
AI powered dietary proportion assessment for improving accuracy and practicality of the balanced meal plate model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Transformation of Epidemiology in the Age of Artificial Intelligence].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 2:1:1 dietary proportion model, promoting balanced eating, faces challenges in practical application due to difficulty in visually estimating portion sizes. To address this, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based application to assist in the accurate assessment of 2:1:1 dietary proportion. This study demonstrated the accuracy of the AI application compared to estimates made by nutrition and dietetics students (ND) and registered dietitians (RD), while also assessing user satisfaction and attitudes. The AI application was trained using images of three popular Thai dishes: Hainanese Chicken Rice, Shrimp Paste Fried Rice, and Egg Noodle, each prepared in three portion variations. The AI system demonstrated significantly lower mean absolute error (MAE) than both ND and RD groups in estimating proportions for Hainanese Chicken Rice and Shrimp Paste Fried Rice (p < 0.05), indicating superior accuracy. User satisfaction surveys revealed that 61% of participants rated their overall experience with the application as moderate, with suggestions for improving accuracy. Over half agreed that the AI tool shows potential as a practical resource for nutrition education and dietary assessments. The AI holds promise as a tool for promoting adherence to the 2:1:1 model and facilitating healthy lifestyle changes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.