ArticleScientific reports2025
Performance of cementitious composites with bayer red mud as a partial cement replacement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the utilization of Bayer red mud (BRM) from Shandong Xinfa Group as a partial cement replacement, with replacement levels of 0.5%, 1%, 5%, 10%, and 15% by mass. The effects of BRM incorporation on setting time, compressive strength (at 3 and 28 days), and microstructural properties were systematically evaluated. Results indicate that the addition of BRM prolongs setting times but remains within standard limits. Compressive strength remained comparable to the control group at replacement levels up to 5%, while higher substitutions (10% and 15%) led to significant reductions. Microstructural analyses with XRD, TG/DTG, and SEM revealed that BRM primarily acts as a micro-filler and nucleation site, participating partially in hydration reactions. Leachability tests (TCLP) confirmed that all heavy metal concentrations in BRM-blended mortars were below regulatory thresholds, demonstrating minimal environmental risk. The findings support the feasibility of using Xinfa BRM as a supplementary cementitious material at doses below 10%, contributing to sustainable solid waste management in the alumina industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.