Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286404›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Spectral peak picking improves tactile speech perception.

Mark D Fletcher, Carl A Verschuur, Esma Akis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark D FletcherFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK. M.D.Fletcher@soton.ac.uk.
Carl A VerschuurFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Esma AkisUniversity of Southampton Auditory Implant Service, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/W032422/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in speech perception often arise from disparities in access to acoustic-phonetic cues, particularly among those with hearing loss. Haptic hearing aids, which convey speech information through the sense of touch, offer a complementary pathway to improve speech understanding. However, effectively transmitting critical speech features through vibrotactile stimulation remains challenging.To address this challenge, we introduce a tactile spectral peak picking (tSPP) approach, integrated into a vocoder-based audio-to-tactile conversion algorithm to enhance vibrotactile phoneme discrimination. The tactile vocoder decomposes audio into eight frequency bands, with tSPP selectively transmitting only the most energetic bands to emphasise dominant spectral features.Tactile phoneme discrimination on the wrist was tested in 26 participants using either the tactile vocoder alone or with the tSPP algorithm selecting one, two, or four peaks. Discrimination improved significantly when one, two, or four peaks were selected relative to the vocoder alone, with the greatest benefits observed for one- and two-peak tSPP (average improvement: 7.5%).These findings demonstrate that selective enhancement of spectrally salient features can improve tactile speech perception. The algorithm is suitable for real-time use in wearable sensory substitution devices and could aid the development of effective haptic hearing aids.

Indexed as

Hearing AidsSpeech PerceptionTouchTouch PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhoneticsYoung AdultAudio-tactileCochlear implantHearing aidMultisensorySpeech readingTactile aid

Identifiers

PMID41286404
PMCPMC12749695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.