ArticleScientific reports2025
Perceived motivators and barriers to implementation of a smoke-free common area policy in multiunit housing in urban Bangladesh.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In Bangladesh, residents of multiunit housing (MUH) face a high risk of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS). Although smoke-free policies are widely recognised as an effective intervention to protect MUH residents, they have received limited attention from policymakers in the country. This study aimed to determine stakeholders' preferences for smoke-free policies and to explore their perspectives on the motivators and barriers to implementing the most preferred smoke-free policy- a common area policy-in MUH complexes in urban Bangladesh. A qualitative descriptive study was conducted among 50 participants, purposively selected from three diverse groups: housing management committees (HMCs), tobacco control civil society organisations (CSOs), and the Bangladesh Fire Service & Civil Defence (FSCD) across seven divisional cities in Bangladesh. Data were collected through key informant interviews (KIIs) and analysed using an inductive thematic analysis approach. The majority of participants were aged 40 to 59 years, held at least a bachelor's degree, were job holders, had lived in MUH for 10 to 19 years, and were identified as non-smokers. All participants reported that no smoke-free policy currently existed in the multiunit housing where they resided. The majority expressed a preference for a smoke-free common area policy in housing complexes. The findings revealed four main motivators for introducing such a policy in MUH: protection of health, reduced maintenance costs, conflict mitigation, and a lower risk of fire accidents. Conversely, several barriers were identified, including smokers' reluctance, limited understanding of the policy, difficulties in monitoring compliance, tenancy vacancies, and implementation costs. To ensure effective development and implementation of smoke-free common area policies, policymakers and housing authorities should consider both the perceived motivators and barriers. Further research involving a boarder range of stakeholders is recommended to gain a better understanding of the dynamics influencing successful policy implementation in MUH complexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.