ArticleScientific reports2025
Light of both high and low melanopic illuminance improves alertness and attention during daytime.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploratory crossover field study indicates efficacy and feasibility of light therapy glasses to mitigate fatigue in multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- SEX-DEPENDENT MODULATION OF WHOLE BRAIN cFOS EXPRESSION BY LIGHT AND MELANOPSIN IN THE MOUSE.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light exposure during the day exerts acute effects on attention, such as how alert and ready a person is for solving problems and goal-oriented behavior. However, to increase the understanding of how different light conditions during daytime affect our attention, there is a need for more studies. The current study, using a sample of healthy, young adults (N = 39; 21.7 ± 2.6 y, 61.5% female), tested the acute effects of morning exposure (09:00-11:00) to four artificial lights on attention and alertness with the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT). The PVT was administered three times in short-wavelength "blue" light [SWL, high melanopic illuminance], long-wavelength "red" light [LWL, low melanopic illuminance], and bright white light [BWL] of high correlated color temperature, and white dim light [DL] as control condition. PVT measures included fluctuations in attention, quantified as intra-individual Reaction Time (RT) variability and the number of lapses; mean RT; and optimum response capability (10% fastest RTs). Compared to DL, participants had significantly fewer lapses and faster mean RT during SWL and LWL, and they enhanced their optimum responses in LWL. There were no significant effects of BWL, and light did not affect RT variability. Surprisingly, SWL was not superior to LWL. Hence, our results suggest that light of both high and low melanopic illuminance can improve alertness and attention in the morning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.