SynthesisLasers in medical science2025
The effectiveness of lower-level laser therapy on the treatment of minor recurrent aphthous ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interrelationships Among Psychological Conditions, Oral Health-related Quality of Life, and Clinical Characteristics in Chinese Patients with Minor Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis.International dental journal · 2026Article
- Pain severity trajectory and influencing factors in children with recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a latent variable growth mixture model.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is the most common oral ulcer, causing pain, impaired function, and reduced quality of life. Conventional treatments offer only partial relief and frequent recurrence. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy of LLLT in minor recurrent aphthous ulcers (mRAU). A systematic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science was performed up to January 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LLLT with sham laser or conventional medication were included. Pain relief was the primary outcome; healing time, ulcer size, and functional recovery were secondary outcomes. Meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity. Twenty-one RCTs involving 810 patients were analyzed. LLLT significantly reduced pain immediately and at days 1-3, with stronger effects in split-mouth designs, sham-controlled groups, and single-session trials. Healing time was also significantly shortened. No consistent benefits were observed for ulcer size or functional recovery. Sensitivity analyses confirmed robust results despite heterogeneity. Several studies applied CO₂laser at low power and short exposure, classified as "quasi-low intensity laser therapy.". LLLT is effective in reducing pain and accelerating healing in mRAU, and a single session may be clinically adequate. However, its impact on ulcer size and functional recovery remain unclear. Well-designed RCTs with standardized protocols and sham controls are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.