ArticleParasitology research2025
Environmental and host- and parasite-associated drivers of the flea-mammal interaction network structure differ between biogeographic realms.
Article in Parasitology research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the effects of climatic factors, host and parasite species richness, and their phylogenetic and functional diversity on the nestedness and modularity of mammal-flea interaction networks from four biogeographic realms. We also tested for the associations between pure structural network dissimilarity (i.e., dissimilarity between host-sharing-by-fleas networks, Dh, or dissimilarity between flea-sharing-by-hosts networks, Df) and environmental dissimilarity, and host and flea compositional, phylogenetic, and functional dissimilarities. We asked whether (a) the relative effects of these factors differ between biogeographic realms and (b) the network structure is more strongly driven by environmental, geographic, host-associated, or flea-associated factors. The climatic drivers of nestedness and modularity differed between realms. The networks in different realms responded to different factors, with the directions of some of these effects being opposite. Among interactor-associated factors, host species richness was most often detected as an important driver of nestedness, whereas flea species richness mainly affected modularity. Dh was mostly explained by host-associated and, to a lesser extent, flea-associated dissimilarity. No effect of host-associated dissimilarity on Df was detected, but it was linked with flea-associated dissimilarity in two of the four realms. Environmental dissimilarity weakly affected Dh and did not affect Df. We conclude that between-realm differences in the drivers of network structure resulted from an interplay of ecological and historical factors, whereas between-interactor differences in their effects on the network structure arose due to the asymmetry in host-flea relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.