ArticleCommunications engineering2025
Machine learning-enabled inverse design of bioinspired layered composite structures with maximum auxetic performance.
Article in Communications engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mechanical Performance of Advanced Composite Materials and Structures (2nd Edition).Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Layered composite structures inspired by biological tissues can exhibit out-of-plane negative Poisson's ratio, but identifying layups that maximize auxetic performance is challenging in high-dimensional designs. Here, we introduce an inverse design framework that searches for laminate layups with minimum Poisson's ratio. The approach combines multi-start resampling with machine learning-guided clustering to map layup families across layer numbers. Analytical relations from laminate mechanics link ply angles to effective properties, and computer simulations with laboratory measurements validate the predicted minima. The analysis resolves three layup categories, explains how shear-strain mismatch across bonded plies drives through-thickness auxetic expansion, and shows that simple symmetry rules reduce the search space. The framework reproduces previously reported minima and uncovers layups that approach lower Poisson's ratios under practical constraints. These results provide a physics-grounded, data-efficient route to engineer layered composite structures with strong auxetic responses and offer concise design rules for impact mitigation, vibration control, and flexible structures.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.