Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286361›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Numerosity adaptation suppresses early visual responses.

Liangyou Zhang, Evi Hendrikx, Yizhen Wang, Surya Gayet, Serge O Dumoulin, Ben M Harvey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Liangyou ZhangExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands. l.zhang6@uu.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9919-2127
Evi HendrikxExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1055-2883
Yizhen WangSchool of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Surya GayetExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9728-1272
Serge O DumoulinExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7474-7711
Ben M HarveyExperimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2694-618X

Funding

China Scholarship Council (CSC) 202208510065Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research) 452.17.012
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and many other animals possess an innate ability to rapidly perceive numerosity: the number of objects in a visual scene. Numerosity perception is influenced by adaptation, whereby previously viewed numerosities affect perception of the current image's numerosity. Parietal and frontal neural populations are tuned to specific preferred numerosities, and this tuning is affected by adaptation. A parallel line of research has revealed that early visual responses monotonically increase with numerosity. Here we use ultra-high field (7 T) fMRI to show that these monotonic responses become less pronounced after adaptation to higher numerosities. Moreover, this neural adaptation effect becomes stronger as we progress through the early visual hierarchy (V1-V3, hV4, LO1-LO2 & V3A/B). These findings show that numerosity adaptation has neural effects on the early visual responses as well as the frontoparietal numerosity-tuned responses. Together, these distinct neural effects are consistent with many features of perceptual numerosity adaptation.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41286361
PMCPMC12644745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.