Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286355›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Prioritizing flexible working memory representations relies on the involvement of the parahippocampal-insula network during memory reactivation.

Chunli Chen, Yusi Xie, Jiaxin Zhao, Shiyun Xu, Cheng Li, Chanlin Yi, Dezhong Yao, Xiaochu Zhang, Fali Li, Peng Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chunli ChenThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6002-4593
Yusi XieThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Jiaxin ZhaoThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6095-3590
Shiyun XuThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Cheng LiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Key Laboratory of Image Recognition, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China.
Chanlin YiThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Dezhong YaoThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-879X
Xiaochu ZhangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, School of Life Science, Division of Life Science and Medicine, University of Science & Technology of China, Hefei, China. zxcustc@ustc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7541-0130
Fali LiThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. fali.li@uestc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2450-4591
Peng XuThe Clinical Hospital of Chengdu Brain Science Institute, MOE Key Lab for Neuroinformation, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. xupeng@uestc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6198-8195

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retrospective cues in working memory (WM) prioritize relevant information and guide attention toward target items to optimize behavior. Although the frontoparietal attention network is known to support this top-down attention mechanism, the broader cortical network behind this process remains elusive. Here, by combining EEG source localization with Bayesian non-negative matrix factorization, we identify nine WM task-related subnetworks, including two newly identified networks: the left parahippocampal-insula network (lPIN) and the right parahippocampal-insula network (rPIN). Dynamic network similarity (DNS) analysis reveals that the brain rapidly transitions into a 'silent' state following memory encoding. During retention, both retro- and neutral-cues reactivate memory representation; however, retro-cues elicit stronger reactivation, primarily involving the lPIN and rPIN. Furthermore, this reactivation correlates positively with behavior in the alpha band and negatively with lateralized alpha power. Additionally, the global network configuration during encoding shows significant behavioral relevance. In contrast, during the retrospective phase, a sparser network pattern with lPIN and rPIN as hub nodes significantly influences both behavior and alpha lateralization. These findings highlight the parahippocampal-insula network's crucial role in enhancing WM behavior through the flexible manipulation of target representations via retrospective attention, thereby supporting the attentional strengthening hypothesis of the retro-cue effect at the large-scale network level.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexMemory, Short-TermNerve NetParahippocampal GyrusAdultAttentionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41286355
PMCPMC12644547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.