ArticleCommunications biology2025
Prioritizing flexible working memory representations relies on the involvement of the parahippocampal-insula network during memory reactivation.
Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retrospective cues in working memory (WM) prioritize relevant information and guide attention toward target items to optimize behavior. Although the frontoparietal attention network is known to support this top-down attention mechanism, the broader cortical network behind this process remains elusive. Here, by combining EEG source localization with Bayesian non-negative matrix factorization, we identify nine WM task-related subnetworks, including two newly identified networks: the left parahippocampal-insula network (lPIN) and the right parahippocampal-insula network (rPIN). Dynamic network similarity (DNS) analysis reveals that the brain rapidly transitions into a 'silent' state following memory encoding. During retention, both retro- and neutral-cues reactivate memory representation; however, retro-cues elicit stronger reactivation, primarily involving the lPIN and rPIN. Furthermore, this reactivation correlates positively with behavior in the alpha band and negatively with lateralized alpha power. Additionally, the global network configuration during encoding shows significant behavioral relevance. In contrast, during the retrospective phase, a sparser network pattern with lPIN and rPIN as hub nodes significantly influences both behavior and alpha lateralization. These findings highlight the parahippocampal-insula network's crucial role in enhancing WM behavior through the flexible manipulation of target representations via retrospective attention, thereby supporting the attentional strengthening hypothesis of the retro-cue effect at the large-scale network level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.