ReviewSpinal cord2026
Development of the international spinal cord injury psychological functioning basic data set.
Review in Spinal cord, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designConsensus exercise, narrative review.
objectivesTo create an International Spinal Cord Injury Psychological Functioning Basic Data Set (PSYCHBDS).
settingInternational working group.
methodsOnline meetings and email communications throughout 2020-2022. The authors reviewed measures used by SCI rehabilitation psychologists and reported in the literature. Selected measures and their psychometric properties were described. Consensus was reached on the measures and other data elements to include in the PSYCHBDS. The draft-PSYCHBDS was further reviewed by members of the International SCI Data Sets Committee, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Board, the International Spinal Cord Society (ISCoS) Executive and Scientific Committees, individual reviewers and societies, and posted on the ASIA and ISCoS websites for 1 month to elicit comments before final approval by ASIA and ISCoS.
resultsThe group agreed to restrict the scope of the PSYCHBDS to the domains of anxiety and depressed mood and to use the 2-item versions of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). The PSYCHBDS consists of six standard and three optional data elements: date of data collection, professional background of data collector (optional), presence of psychological disorders before the onset of SCI, administration mode, PHQ-2 score, PHQ-9 score (optional), GAD-2 score, GAD-7 score (optional), and therapy for current psychological disorders. A data collection form and scoring instructions were developed.
conclusionsAn international working group of experts achieved consensus on a data set to collect basic information on psychological factors and recommends its use in SCI/D rehabilitation and research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41286349What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.