ArticleScientific reports2025
A bicentric study on the application of dual energy CT for predicting hemorrhagic transformation post endovascular thrombectomy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) critically impacts outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Building upon the validated utility of post-EVT dual-energy CT (DECT), this study focused on developing and integrating a DECT-based predictive model with key clinical variables to achieve precise, individualized quantification of HT risk. This retrospective study analyzed 116 thrombectomy treated AIS patients stratified by HT status. Post-EVT DECT within 24 h assessed CT values (in Hounsfield Units, HU) of ischemic lesions on mixed energy images; CT values (in HU) on virtual non-contrast (VNC) images and on Sn80 keV and Sn150 keV monoenergetic images; absolute iodine concentrations (AIC, in mg/mL); and relative iodine concentrations (RIC, in %, where RIC = lesion AIC/sigmoid sinus AIC), using follow-up imaging and clinical criteria as the gold standard for HT.. HT patients exhibited higher NIHSS (median 14.5 vs. 9.0) and lower ASPECTS (9 vs. 13) than non-HT (nHT) counterparts, with elevated glucose (GLU, 8.26 vs. 6.45 mmol/L) and lower systolic blood pressure (SBP, 147.5 vs. 156.5 mmHg) (all P < 0.050). DECT-derived parameters demonstrated diagnostic utility, with both iodine overlay maps (IOM) and VNC positivity (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.