ArticleScientific reports2025
Angry facial expressions elicit a late attentional withdrawal.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Facial expressions of emotion are salient social cues that can trigger adaptive behavioral responses-such as facilitated approach or avoidance movements in response to positive or negative stimuli, respectively. We conducted a behavioral experiment testing the hypothesis that while both happy and angry faces initially capture attention, angry expressions subsequently prompt a withdrawal of attention-a pattern consistent with aversive behavioral tendencies. Using a target-detection paradigm, we varied the spatial location and timing (50 ms vs. 350 ms) of targets relative to face stimuli. Results supported the hypothesis: angry faces led to faster responses to targets appearing nearer to the observer (i.e., farther from the face) at 350 ms, suggesting attentional retraction. A follow-up fMRI experiment replicated this design with only the 350 ms delay. Behaviorally, responses were faster to targets near happy faces and away from angry ones. These effects correlated with subjective reports of being attracted or repelled by the expressions, as well as with individual differences in empathy and trait avoidance. Neuroimaging data revealed an interaction between emotion and target location in early visual cortices, modulated by subjective attraction-retraction ratings. These findings support the idea of attention disengaging from angry faces, with both behavioral and neural correlates linked to individual affective dispositions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.