ArticleScientific reports2025
Antimicrobial peptide prediction based on contrastive learning and gated convolutional neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioactive peptides targeting dyslipidemia and atherosclerosis: from computational discovery and data bottlenecks to precision medicine translation.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Harnessing Machine Learning Approaches for the Identification, Characterization, and Optimization of Novel Antimicrobial Peptides.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The excessive use of antibiotics presents significant risks, as it not only drives the emergence of antibiotic resistance in microbial pathogens but also disrupts the microbial communities essential for maintaining normal human physiological functions. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) have garnered increasing attention as a highly promising alternative to antibiotics. The use of computational methods to identify AMPs is becoming increasingly popular, as these approaches can considerably reduce the time and cost involved. In this work, we propose a deep learning-based AMP recognition framework, CG-AMP, aimed at efficiently identifying AMPs. CG-AMP adopts a dual-module architecture, where the first module learns the feature representation space through a pre-trained language model and contrastive learning, while the second module incorporates an enhanced Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) to more efficiently extract feature information. This design aims to effectively integrate multimodal features by combining the strengths of both methods, thereby enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of AMP identification. We evaluated CG-AMP on two independent test sets and compared its performance with current state-of-the-art models. The results demonstrated that CG-AMP was a reliable AMP identification tool. Specifically, on the AMPlify and DAMP test sets, CG-AMP achieved accuracies of 0.9497 and 0.9403, F1 scores of 0.9508 and 0.9392, and Matthews correlation coefficients of 0.8994 and 0.8812, respectively, outperforming other existing methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.