ArticleScientific reports2025
Nutrient-response modeling with a single and interpretable artificial neuron.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise estimation of nutrient requirements and utilization efficiency is fundamental to nutritional sciences, yet it is mainly performed using classical nonlinear regression models. These models are interpretable but require careful selection of the functional form and initial parameter values. Flexible machine learning (ML) methods are seemingly disliked due to their perceived "black box" nature, which can obscure biological insight. A minimal and interpretable ML framework addresses this gap in nutrient-response modeling. The proposed approach uses a single artificial neuron with a hyperbolic tangent activation. Mathematically, this resembles a four-parameter sigmoidal function but with greater flexibility and distinct parameter definitions, allowing capture of the monotonic, saturating dynamics typical of essential nutrient responses. The method is enhanced with modern ML best practices, including data augmentation, Bayesian regularization, and bootstrap resampling, providing robust, uncertainty-quantified estimates of key nutritional metrics-such as asymptotic response, inflection point, and nutrient requirements-even from small datasets. Evaluations across 12 diverse datasets from poultry and fish studies, including amino acids and phosphorus, demonstrated that the single artificial neuron matches or exceeds the performance of classical models while providing full analytical transparency. The framework is implemented as a no-code graphical application, 'NutriCurvist', offering an easy-to-use alternative tool for nutrient-response modeling to support data-driven, precision nutrition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.