ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluating digital technologies for architectural heritage preservation using interval-valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy aggregation operators.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Digital technologies have made their presence in the field of architectural heritage as an essential tool to save most historical structures from wearing out, environmental damage, and urban transformation. The objective of this research is to investigate the effects of digital information technology on the preservation of architectural heritage with a novel integration of interval valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy weighted average (IVq-ROFWA) and interval valued q-rung orthopair fuzzy weighted geometric (IVq-ROFWG) operators, an approach that has not, to the best of current knowledge, been previously applied in this domain. The application of these more advanced fuzzy aggregation methods provides the benefit of incorporating uncertainty and imprecision in expert judgments to account for the indeterminate, implicit relationships between various preservation criteria, including data accuracy, integration with restoration efforts, and long-term data accessibility. Given five alternatives considered in terms of five attributes, the IVq-ROFWA method rated augmented reality as the highest. In contrast, the IVq-ROFWG method rated heritage building information modeling as the highest. The present research highlights another aspect of high relevance to decision-makers, as it provides valuable recommendations on selecting the most effective digital tools to preserve their heritage. The novelty of the study lies in the introduction of new types of IVq-ROFWA and IVq-ROFWG operators in architectural heritage conservation, which provide more robust, precise, and reliable decisions based on uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.