ArticleScientific reports2025
WA-NET: enhanced boundary-aware segmentation of skin lesions via frequency-spatial feature fusion and attention-guided edge refinement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Skin Lesion and Cancer Detection Using Computer Vision: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Efficient Dermoscopic Lesion Segmentation via Multi-Directional State-Space Modeling and Frequency-Aware Boundary Refinement.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skin cancer remains a major public health concern due to its high morbidity and mortality rates. While automatic segmentation techniques have improved diagnostic accuracy, they continue to face challenges such as artefacts, small lesion detection, and poor contrast between lesions and surrounding tissue. To overcome these limitations, we propose WA-NET, a novel skin lesion segmentation network that integrates a Boundary Refinement module (BRM) and an Enhanced Wavelet Transform (EWT) module. The BRM employs independent edge detection branches to enhance boundary representation, particularly in low-contrast regions. The EWT module adaptively fuses multi-scale, multi-directional sub-band features in the frequency domain to better capture texture and structural details. Furthermore, a composite loss function combining binary cross-entropy, Dice loss, and edge-supervised loss is introduced to improve both global segmentation accuracy and local boundary precision. WA-NET achieves state-of-the-art performance on three benchmark datasets-ISIC2017 (DSC: 0.9395, SE: 0.9357, ACC: 0.9573), ISIC2018 (DSC: 0.9458, SE: 0.9460, ACC: 0.9610), and PH2 (DSC: 0.9517, SE: 0.9593, ACC: 0.9638)-demonstrating strong robustness and superior boundary segmentation under challenging imaging conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.