ArticleScientific reports2025
Complex and diverse patterns of neurocranial development in Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Homo.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- New Insights Into Cranial Base Ontogeny in Modern Humans Through Morphometric Analysis.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Even though poorly understood, early ontogeny may have influenced the distinct morphologies and behaviors of Homo sapiens, fossil hominins and extant African apes. Leveraging an extensive high-resolution computed tomography dataset, we investigated previously unexplored relationships between facial, basicranial and endocranial development during early ontogeny in African apes, H. sapiens, Australopithecus afarensis and Paranthropus robustus. We found that a delay in endocranial growth in Pan paniscus infants does not necessarily indicate a uniform trend toward delayed development, suggesting more complexity in developmental processes than previously thought. A. afarensis exhibited protracted endocranial growth compared to P. robustus, a contrast even greater than that between P. paniscus and Pan troglodytes, suggesting that endocranial development in A. afarensis more closely resembles that of H. sapiens than P. robustus. Unlike the shared delayed development of H. sapiens and Homo erectus, A. afarensis and P. robustus show contrasting developmental patterns. We therefore propose that early ontogeny in Australopithecus and Paranthropus was variable, showing no consistent pattern of developmental delay or acceleration across species. Our finding also enhances our ability to identify neonatal cranial remains in the fossil record, providing new opportunities for expanding much needed sample size and advance paleobiological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.