Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286282›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

What makes a dog a label-learner: individual cognitive differences underlying label-learning abilities in domestic dogs (Canis familiaris).

Juliane Kaminski, Svenja Capitain, Friederike Kühr, Christine Nussbaum, Juliane Bräuer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Juliane KaminskiCentre for comparative & evolutionary Psychology, School of Psychology, Sport and Health Sciences, University of Portsmouth, King Henry 1 st Street, Portsmouth, PO12DY, UK. juliane.kaminski@port.ac.uk.
Svenja CapitainDomestication Lab, Konrad Lorenz Institute of Ethology, Department of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, Vienna, 1210, Austria.
Friederike KührDogStudies, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Christine NussbaumDepartment for General Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Friedrich Schiller University of Jena, Am Steiger 3, 07743, Jena, Germany.
Juliane BräuerDogStudies, Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, Kahlaische Strasse 10, 07745, Jena, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft BR 3601/7-1University of Portsmouth Internal funding
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Only a few dogs in the world are label-learners, with the ability to process and retain a vast number of object referents. Here we present data from a battery of cognitive tests that could explain why they outperform their conspecifics. In a citizen science approach, we instructed dog owners across five different countries, on how to administer a series of eight cognitive tests to their dogs. The group of label-learner dogs (N = 11) was then compared to control dogs (N = 11) that did not have that label learning ability. Our experiment demonstrates, for the first time, that the label-learner dogs' ability might be based on measurable individual differences in three specific cognitive domains: their interest in novel objects, their targeted interest in objects and their inhibitory skills. Future research, replicating the results on a larger sample, can explore if the label-learner dogs' outstanding cognitive skills are already present at the puppy stage or develop over time.

Indexed as

CognitionLearningAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDogsFemaleIndividualityMaleDomestic dogs‘genius’ dogsIndividual differencesLabel-learners

Identifiers

PMID41286282
PMCPMC12644468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.