Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286259›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Interpretable deep learning models for independent fertilizer and crop recommendation.

Stella Mary Venkateswara, Jayashree Padmanaban

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Stella Mary VenkateswaraDepartment of Computer Technology, MIT, Anna University, Chennai, India. stellamaryvenkateswara@gmail.com.
Jayashree PadmanabanDepartment of Computer Technology, MIT, Anna University, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies is fundamentally transforming agriculture. This integration enables the real-time collection and analysis of critical data such as soil nutrient levels, temperature, humidity, and climatic conditions. A data-driven approach allows for independent fertilizer and crop recommendations, maximizing yield and promoting resource efficiency. Soil properties play a crucial role in crop growth, facilitating the absorption of essential nutrients like Nitrogen (N), Phosphorus (P), and Potassium (K). However, traditional farming practices often lead to nutrient inefficiency and soil health degradation, negatively impacting productivity. While Machine Learning (ML) techniques have emerged for recommending fertilizers and crops, they frequently encounter issues such as inadequate feature selection and class imbalance. These limitations hinder their ability to accurately model the intricate relationships among environmental factors, soil conditions, and crop nutrient requirements. To address these challenges, this study presents a unified smart recommendation system that utilizes TabNet, a deep learning architecture specifically designed for tabular data. The novelty of this work lies in leveraging TabNet's attention-driven learning to directly discover important patterns from preprocessed IoT-enabled agricultural data for accurate and interpretable crop and fertilizer classifications, without relying on prior feature selection. To enhance transparency, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) is applied at the final stage to provide post hoc interpretability, allowing stakeholders to understand the model's reasoning behind each recommendation. Evaluated with the Crop and Fertilizer Dataset from Western Maharashtra, TabNet achieves impressive classification accuracies of 95.24% for fertilizer recommendations and 96.21% for crop recommendations, outperforming conventional classifier and existing approach. The study employs robust preprocessing techniques, such as iterative imputation and the Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE), to ensure data quality and class balance. The model's performance and generalizability were rigorously assessed using fivefold cross-validation, consistently maintaining these high accuracy levels across folds.

Indexed as

Crop recommendationDeep learningExplainable artificial intelligenceFertilizer recommendationInternet of ThingsShapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)Smart farmingTabnet

Identifiers

PMID41286259
PMCPMC12644580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.