ReviewJournal of computer-aided molecular design2025
pKa prediction for small molecules: an overview of experimental, quantum, and machine learning-based approaches.
Review in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- SMILES2Docking: An Open-Source Desktop Workflow for Ligand Ionization, Stereochemistry-Aware Preparation and Semi-Empirical 3D Refinement.Molecular informatics · 2026Article
- EasyDock 1.3: An Automated Pipeline for Molecular Docking.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Unifying pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- Targeting Selectivity: Improving Golgi α-Mannosidase II (GMII) Inhibitors Through In Silico Studies.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Benchmarking pJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pKa, also known as the logarithmic dissociation constant, is a crucial parameter that defines the ionization level of a molecule when it is in solution. It is essential for several physicochemical properties, including lipophilicity, solubility, protein binding affinity, and the ability to cross biological membranes. Therefore, obtaining accurate pKa assessments is vital for modifying and refining the acidity and basicity of organic compounds. Accurate prediction can help improve drug design, optimize pharmaceutical formulations, analyze the behavior of pollutants in the environment, and guide the development of new materials. Traditionally, pKa determination has relied on experimental techniques. However, the recent emergence of machine learning (ML) has led to significant advances in pKa prediction. In this review, we examine various approaches for pKa prediction, with a focus on recent advances in machine learning. We discuss the performance of these models, drawing on results reported in publications related to the SAMPL Challenges and Novartis prediction challenges. Because of their different theoretical and computational frameworks, protein pKa prediction methods are not included in this review, which focuses exclusively on small organic molecules. Finally, we highlight current challenges and future directions, including the integration of hybrid models combining quantum mechanics and machine learning, the improvement of benchmark databases, and the development of more universal and interpretable predictive models. We hope that this paper can provide useful guidelines for future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41286245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.