ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting thickness distribution of thermoplastic dental aligners via KBKZ-based finite element analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to clarify the thickness distribution and its dynamic evolution during the thermoforming of PET thermoplastic dental film for orthodontic appliances using a numerical simulation system based on the KBKZ integral constitutive model. It establishes a mapping relationship between initial and formed thickness, offering a method to optimize membrane thickness and process parameters at various stages of orthodontic treatment. A nonlinear viscoelastic finite element analysis framework was constructed using the KBKZ integral constitutive model. PET thermoplastic dental film with initial thicknesses of 0.6 mm, 0.8 mm, and 1.0 mm were studied. Thermoforming simulations were conducted using the ASNSY-Polyflow module. Physical membrane thermoforming experiments were also performed. Thickness distribution data of the formed samples were measured with a thickness micrometer. The analysis focused on thickness distribution characteristics in the lingual, buccal, and occlusal functional regions. The numerical simulations and experimental measurements showed significant consistency. The thickness distribution curves exhibited an average Pearson coefficient [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) and Spearman coefficient [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]); the thickness change rate curves showed [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]). The formed appliances exhibited typical regional heterogeneity. The thickness attenuation rate (η) in the lingual and buccal regions was [Formula: see text], significantly higher than that in the occlusal region ([Formula: see text]). This study shows that the finite element method using the KBKZ integral model can accurately predict the thickness distribution and its changing law of invisible braces during the thermoforming process. In terms of thickness prediction, the accuracy of the error with actual production is successfully achieved to be less than 7%. In future orthodontic plans, combined with the forward-looking "dynamic thickness compensation" strategy concept of this study, the stiffness of the appliance can be controlled by designing the initial diaphragm thickness. This offers a parametric solution for clinical scenarios needing high orthodontic forces, such as molar intrusion, tooth rotation, and sequential treatments. This enhances the biomechanical controllability of the clear aligner system and has important clinical engineering application value for improving the accuracy of orthodontic force control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.