ReviewArchives of sexual behavior2025
COSMIN Review About Assessment Tools for Sexuality Knowledge in People with Intellectual Disability.
Review in Archives of sexual behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the relevance of assessing the level of sexuality knowledge in people with intellectual disability, appropriate tools for measuring this domain are scarce. Our aim was to critically appraise, compare, and summarize the measurement quality and psychometric properties of all self-reported sexuality knowledge questionnaires for people with intellectual disability. To this end, a systematic search of the Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases was performed. This review was based on the COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Eighteen studies were found that reported on the measurement properties of nine assessment tools. The psychometric properties of the instruments were generally indeterminate or not reported due to incomplete data, and the use of statistical methods not preferred according to the criteria of good psychometric measures. There was moderate quality evidence of the psychometric properties of the scales. The Detection of Sexual Abuse Risk Screening Scale and the Inventory of Sexual Knowledge of People with Intellectual Disability are instruments that have demonstrated potential for use, but their psychometric quality for non-Spanish populations should be assessed. In conclusion, future studies on property measurement instruments for the assessment of sexual knowledge are needed. Therefore, the instruments should be updated because most studies were performed nearly a decade ago.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.