ArticleScientific reports2025
Examining vulnerability of planar networks from a large-scale region segmentation perspective.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evaluating the vulnerability of planar networks, such as road systems, is crucial for optimizing network topology and enhancing network defensive capabilities. In this study, we introduce the concept of "large-scale region segmentation" and propose a novel approach for assessing the vulnerability of planar networks. To validate our method, we employ the network efficiency metric to quantify network performance under various attack scenarios, with taking random failures and betweenness-based targeted attacks for comparison. Experiments are conducted on both real-world urban road networks (including Atlanta, Chengdu, Florence, and Paris) and randomly generated planar networks. Results across all tested datasets indicate that the proposed method outperforms both random and betweenness-based attack strategies in rapidly degrading network efficiency. The main contribution of this work lies in considering the overall connectivity of planar networks, rather than focusing solely on individual nodes or edges, thereby introducing a vulnerability analysis approach from a large-scale region segmentation perspective. This approach significantly advances the assessment of planar network vulnerability. Our findings offer practical implications for the planning and emergency management of planar networks, such as transportation systems, and provide a foundational basis for improving network security and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.