Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286234›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Examining vulnerability of planar networks from a large-scale region segmentation perspective.

Gang Liu, Chengfu Huang, Ye Tian, Jing He, Zhiyong Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gang LiuCollege of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China. liugang2014@cdut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8856-8746
Chengfu HuangCollege of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.
Ye TianSchool of Geography, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. ye.tian@ucd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9532-6086
Jing HeCollege of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.
Zhiyong LuoCollege of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 42371418Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Philosophy and Social Sciences for Mountain Tourism Safety 24SDLYAQZZ001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluating the vulnerability of planar networks, such as road systems, is crucial for optimizing network topology and enhancing network defensive capabilities. In this study, we introduce the concept of "large-scale region segmentation" and propose a novel approach for assessing the vulnerability of planar networks. To validate our method, we employ the network efficiency metric to quantify network performance under various attack scenarios, with taking random failures and betweenness-based targeted attacks for comparison. Experiments are conducted on both real-world urban road networks (including Atlanta, Chengdu, Florence, and Paris) and randomly generated planar networks. Results across all tested datasets indicate that the proposed method outperforms both random and betweenness-based attack strategies in rapidly degrading network efficiency. The main contribution of this work lies in considering the overall connectivity of planar networks, rather than focusing solely on individual nodes or edges, thereby introducing a vulnerability analysis approach from a large-scale region segmentation perspective. This approach significantly advances the assessment of planar network vulnerability. Our findings offer practical implications for the planning and emergency management of planar networks, such as transportation systems, and provide a foundational basis for improving network security and efficiency.

Indexed as

Large-scale region segmentationNetwork efficiencyPlanar networksVulnerability

Identifiers

PMID41286234
PMCPMC12749848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.