ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of multiple steam sterilizations on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed surgical items.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Miniature Soft Robot With Magnetically Reprogrammable Surgical Functions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Mechanically adaptive materials with tunable stiffness for biomedical devices: Mechanisms, applications, and perspectives.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Clinical Implications of Sterilization Methods Applied to 3D-Printed Implant Surgical Guides: An In Vitro Study.International dental journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates how repeated steam sterilization affects the mechanical properties of 3D-printed surgical items made from methacrylate-based Surgical Guide Resin. Unlike single-use instruments, reusable 3D-printed instruments undergo multiple sterilization cycles, which may compromise their durability. Cuboids produced using Digital Light Processing (DLP) were exposed to up to ten steam sterilization cycles (121 °C, 110 kPa), followed by drying. Mechanical tests included three-point bending, Shore D hardness, and microscopic analysis to assess elasticity, hardness, and structural changes. Initial sterilization cycles increased hardness and stiffness due to further polymer cross-linking. However, continued exposure led to visible surface damage, microcracks, and signs of polymer degradation. While bending strength remained relatively stable, cumulative effects ultimately reduced material integrity. These results raise concerns about the long-term reliability of multi-use 3D-printed surgical instruments. The findings suggest that current sterilization practices should be re-evaluated, especially for items intended for repeated use. Future research should focus on improving material resistance to minimize thermal degradation. This work offers critical insights into the safety and performance of reusable 3D-printed surgical items in both veterinary and human medical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.