Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286225›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Impact of multiple steam sterilizations on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed surgical items.

Magdalena Antonowicz-Hüpsch, Piotr Trębacz, Lisa Adele Piras, Agata Piątek, Angelika Auguścik, Klaudia Cholewa, Wiktoria Groelich, Mateusz Pawlik, Luca Manassero, Aleksandra Kurkowska and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Miniature Soft Robot With Magnetically Reprogrammable Surgical Functions.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Magdalena Antonowicz-HüpschDepartment of Biomaterials and Medical Devices Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Piotr TrębaczDepartment of Surgery and Anaesthesiology of Small Animals, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland. piotr_trebacz@sggw.edu.pl.
Lisa Adele PirasDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Agata PiątekDepartment of Biomaterials and Medical Devices Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Angelika AuguścikDepartment of Biomaterials and Medical Devices Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Klaudia CholewaDepartment of Medical Informatics and Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Wiktoria GroelichDepartment of Biomaterials and Medical Devices Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Mateusz PawlikDepartment of Biomaterials and Medical Devices Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Luca ManasseroDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Aleksandra KurkowskaDepartment of Biomaterials and Medical Devices Engineering, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800, Zabrze, Poland.
Anna BarteczkoCABIOMEDE Ltd., Karola Olszewskiego 21, 25-663, Kielce, Poland.
Davide MancusiDepartment of Veterinary Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Michał CzopowiczDivision of Veterinary Epidemiology and Economics, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences-SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159 C, 02-776, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates how repeated steam sterilization affects the mechanical properties of 3D-printed surgical items made from methacrylate-based Surgical Guide Resin. Unlike single-use instruments, reusable 3D-printed instruments undergo multiple sterilization cycles, which may compromise their durability. Cuboids produced using Digital Light Processing (DLP) were exposed to up to ten steam sterilization cycles (121 °C, 110 kPa), followed by drying. Mechanical tests included three-point bending, Shore D hardness, and microscopic analysis to assess elasticity, hardness, and structural changes. Initial sterilization cycles increased hardness and stiffness due to further polymer cross-linking. However, continued exposure led to visible surface damage, microcracks, and signs of polymer degradation. While bending strength remained relatively stable, cumulative effects ultimately reduced material integrity. These results raise concerns about the long-term reliability of multi-use 3D-printed surgical instruments. The findings suggest that current sterilization practices should be re-evaluated, especially for items intended for repeated use. Future research should focus on improving material resistance to minimize thermal degradation. This work offers critical insights into the safety and performance of reusable 3D-printed surgical items in both veterinary and human medical applications.

Indexed as

Printing, Three-DimensionalSteamSterilizationSurgical InstrumentsHumansMaterials TestingSteamAdditive manufacturingAutoclavingCatsDogsSmall animals

Identifiers

PMID41286225
PMCPMC12644633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.