Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41286194›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Experimental investigation and machine learning-based prediction of brittleness index in heavyweight cement slurries.

Danial Fakhri, Mohammad Mehdi Karbala, Hamid Reza Nejati, Ali Saedi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danial FakhriDepartment of Applied Sciences, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, 555 Boulevard de l'Université, Chicoutimi, QC, Canada.
Mohammad Mehdi KarbalaDepartment of Rock Mechanics, School of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Hamid Reza NejatiDepartment of Rock Mechanics, School of Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran. h.nejati@modares.ac.ir.
Ali SaediDepartment of Mineral, Metallurgical, and Materials Engineering, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In engineering design, the brittleness index (BI) seems to play a significant role in material selection, failure forecasting, and service performance. Determining BI is traditionally a laborious, expensive, and highly experimental process. This study gives a full framework that combines experimental tests with machine learning methods to model the brittleness behavior of the heavy-weight cement slurries. The study is based on different experimental tests, such as Split Hopkinson pressure bar Test, Uniaxial Compressive Strength Test, Brazilian Test and etc. on mechanical and physical properties of ten different slurry formulations and a dataset of 250 experimental observations from these formulations, each with 14 independent input parameters. Fourteen machine learning models were created, and their accuracy and dependability were statistically compared, and a new Equation has been developed for estimating the BI based on the test results. Gaussian process regression and support vector regression were the two most accurate models based on interaction with each of the models; when using the full set of input variables, their R

Indexed as

Brittleness indexExperimental testHeavy-weight cement slurryMachine learningMechanical properties

Identifiers

PMID41286194
PMCPMC12644837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.