ArticleMicrobial ecology2025
Contribution of DNA Metabarcoding to the Environmental Fungal Assessments in Hospitals.
Article in Microbial ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between environmental mold exposure and mild cognitive impairment in older adults: a case-control study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- An Integrated Analysis Approach to Unravel theJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hospitals are particularly sensitive environments where immunosuppressed patients might acquire invasive fungal infections. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out periodical environmental microbiological assessments that evaluate the fungal bioburden in air and surfaces from different hospital zones. Current microbiological monitoring protocols at healthcare settings are mostly based on cultivation, while environmental DNA (eDNA) assessments are still scarce and should be further evaluated. To fill this gap, this study combines a large sampling scheme, comprising > 200 samples (air, surface, dust and soil) collected from four zones at three Spanish hospitals in two campaigns (winter and autumn), with two eDNA approaches (DNA metabarcoding and quantitative PCR) to characterize the hospital mycobiomes (diversity, community composition and airborne load), compared to a parallel culture-dependent study. DNA metabarcoding revealed a much more comprehensive inventory of hospital fungi compared to culturing; however, both approaches found similar dominant taxa including a variety of potentially opportunistic human pathogens. Hospital mycobiomes were affiliated to 4 phyla (mostly Ascomycota and Basidiomycota), 35 classes, 114 orders, 305 families, 643 genera and 535 species. The dominant genera, in both air and surfaces from the three hospitals, were Cladosporium, Alternaria, Aureobasidium, Penicillium, Neodidymelliopsis, Aspergillus, Pseudopithomyces and Stemphylium. The yeasts Candida and Clavispora were particularly abundant on high-touch surfaces indoors. The most important explanatory factors for the variance in community composition were the hospital and zone where samples were collected, the type of sample and the sampling campaign. DNA metabarcoding can assist hospital managers by providing an in-depth characterization of the baseline hospital mycobiome during normal operating conditions, as well as identifying and controlling community imbalances and associated health risks under demanding situations such as construction works or reported clinical outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.