ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2025
Design, synthesis, pharmacological evaluation and computational modeling of 4-formyl-2-nitrophenyl quinoline-8-sulfonate derived thiosemicarbazones as antidiabetic agents.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A novel series of thiosemicarbazone derivatives 6(a-i), synthesized from 4-formyl-2-nitrophenyl quinoline-8-sulfonate, was evaluated for its antidiabetic potential. Among them, compound 6i (IC₅₀ = 54.51 ± 0.84 µM) displayed the most potent α-glucosidase inhibition, whereas 6e (IC₅₀ = 9.66 ± 0.14 µM) exhibited superior α-amylase inhibition, indicating their dual therapeutic potential against key carbohydrate-hydrolyzing enzymes implicated in postprandial hyperglycemia. These derivatives showed structural diversity with potent and selective inhibition profiles. Structure-activity relationship analysis revealed that electron-withdrawing substituents enhanced enzyme affinity and biological activity. However, molecular docking studies demonstrated strong binding affinities for compounds 6f and 6b with docking scores of - 9.1 to - 10.4 kcal/mol against target proteins, via hydrogen bonding and π-π interactions with catalytic residues. Furthermore, in-silico ADMET evaluation predicted good oral bioavailability, low toxicity, and favorable pharmacokinetic properties. The Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations supported experimental results, where studied compounds showed lower HOMO-LUMO energy gaps (2.41-3.42 eV), suggesting their significant chemical reactivity and molecular stability of these compounds. Overall, in-vitro and in-silico studies revealed that compounds 6b, 6f, 6e, and 6i emerged as promising lead molecules for developing dual-action therapeutic agents targeting hyperglycemia and oxidative damage in diabetes management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41286166What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.