SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2025
Systematic review on the safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with stereotactic body radiotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.
Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Data-driven precision: artificial intelligence redefining immunoradiotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) patients, comparing SBRT alone to SBRT combined with immunotherapy. A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic databases, including Google Scholar, Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and PubMed, were searched up to October 23, 2024. Studies evaluating SBRT alone or in combination with immunotherapy for APC were included. Key outcomes assessed were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Data were analyzed and presented as percentages. The study is registered with PROSPERO under the registration number CRD420250655873. The 1-year OS rate was 44% for SBRT alone, compared to 8% for nivolumab + ipilimumab + SBRT, 80% for durvalumab + SBRT, and 2% for durvalumab + tremelimumab + SBRT. The 1-year PFS rate was 46% for SBRT alone, versus 43%, 4%, and 3% for the respective combinations. Grade 3/4 TRAEs were lower for SBRT alone (21.5%) compared to combination therapies: 79.1% for nivolumab + ipilimumab + SBRT, 73.2% for nivolumab + SBRT, 33.3% for durvalumab + SBRT, and 61.1% for durvalumab + tremelimumab + SBRT. SBRT is an effective treatment option for APC, with a 1-year OS rate of 44% and relatively low TRAEs. The combination of durvalumab + SBRT demonstrated a promising 1-year OS rate of 80%, highlighting its potential for further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.