ArticleScientific reports2025
Functional and structural clustering of social relationship layers among college students for link prediction with applications to perceived drinking networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Studies on college drinking-a behavior associated with health risks and reduced productivity-often rely on broadly defined peer or friendship networks. Yet, friendship networks can be further divided into more specific relational types, and the associations between such diverse social ties and drinking ties remain poorly understood. This study adopts a multilayer network framework to conduct a fine-grained examination of ten distinct types of social networks (i.e., layers)-including friendship, leadership, emotional support, and perceived drinking-by analyzing their structural similarity across three levels (node, link, and triad) and along a relationship-axis spectrum. We cluster networks based on these multi-level similarities, identifying three primary clusters (Affiliation, Leadership, and Drinking) and assess whether these structurally coherent clusters contribute to improved link prediction performance in perceived drinking networks. Both k-means clustering based on multi-level structural similarity and projection-based analysis along the hierarchical-horizontal spectrum revealed that perceived drinking nominations are structurally closest to leadership layers, followed by emotional support layers within the Affiliation cluster. Assessing whether these functional clusters can improve link prediction in perceived drinking networks, we find that layers within the same cluster yield predictive performance close to that of models using all layers. Notably, emotional support layers, which may reflect their structural proximity and distributed connectivity, offer the highest link prediction accuracy for drinking ties. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that coherent clusters of fine-grained, functionally and structurally aligned social layers facilitate more efficient inference in sparse or partially observed drinking-related networks. This, in turn, highlights their potential utility in predicting and preventing health-risk behaviors-such as alcohol use-that are typically difficult to observe or measure directly, and clarifies the types of relationships most strongly associated with such behaviors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.